The Difference Of Learning Result Of Education Evaluation Subject Viewed From Formative Test Form And Thinking Ability

Purwanto Purwanto

Abstract


This study aims at determining (1) the difference of learning result of Education Evaluation subject for
students tested with formative test of essay and objective, (2) the influence of formative test on learning result of
Education Evaluation subject viewed from thinking ability, (3) the difference of learning result of Education Evaluation
subject on students tested with essay and objective formative test for the students having divergent thinking ability, (4)
the difference of learning result of Education Evaluation subject on students tested with essay and objective formative
test for students having convergent thinking ability. The results of this study show: (1) learning result of Education
Evaluation subject of students tested with essay formative test is higher than those tested with objective formative test, (2)
the influence of formative test on learning result of Education Evaluation subject depends on thinking ability, (3) for
students having divergent thinking ability, learning result of Education Evaluation subject of students tested with essay
formative test is higher than those tested with objective formative test, (4) for students having convergent thinking
ability, learning result of Education Evaluation subject of students tested with essay formative test is lower than those
tested with objective formative test. Formative evaluation using certain test is profitable for students having certain
thinking ability. Based on those results, this study is recommended to give combination of both formative test forms, so
that students at all thinking abilities may obtain fairness in testing.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alimudin, A. et al. (2017) ‘The Factors Affecting Land Prices In Housing Location In Sidoarjo Regency’, International Journal of Society Development and Engagement, 1(1), pp. 2597–4777.

Barid, M. et al. (2017) ‘UKM Development Business Loan’, 1(1), pp. 99–110.

Barokati, N. and Annas, F. (2013) ‘Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning pada Mata Kuliah Pemrograman Komputer (Studi Kasus: UNISDA Lamongan)’, SISFO Vol 4 No 5, 4.

Barokati, N., Wajdi, N. and Barid, M. (2017) ‘Application Design Library With gamification concept’, Jurnal Lentera: Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan dan Teknologi. Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Miftahul Ula Nganjuk, 3(1), pp. 93–102.

Martawijaya, M. A. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Ilmiah Siswa Smp. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 1(1), 54–64.

Ifit Novita Sari, V. (2015) ‘Kurikulum Ideal untuk Indonesia’.

Kultural, D. (2016) ‘DAKWAH KULTURAL, KARYA ‘ULAMA INDONESIA Kajian Untuk Menangkal Radikalisme Agama Muh. Barid Nizaruddin Wajdi 1’, Lentera, 1, pp. 37–54.

Octarina, N. F. and Wajdi, M. B. N. (2017) ‘Human Right, PSK And Justice In Law’, VRIJSPRAAK : International Journal of Law, 1(1), pp. 82–112. Available at: http://socialscience.journal-research.org/index.php/Vrijspraak/article/view/20 (Accessed: 2 November 2017).

Jufri, M., Bakhtiar, M. I., & Aras, M. (2016). Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Handling Through The Trauma Healing For Scout Care. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling, 123-128.

Yuniningsih, Y., Widodo, S. and Wajdi, M. B. N. (2017) ‘An analysis of Decision Making in the Stock Investment’, Economic: Journal of Economic and Islamic Law, 8(2), pp. 122–128.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 ADRI International Journal Of Education Technology